Vs. Oregon. Stanford 2011: 2010 Script Can Run For A Second Time?
Thirteen months ago, Oregon destroyed more than Stanford's final game of three quarters, the use of speed and offensive diversity in the process. Is the same script work tonight, or manipulate Cardinals Ducks a little better with a little home cooking?
November 12, 2011
After a quarter of the game last year in Eugene, Oregon led Stanford with an 21-3 margin. They converted two Oregon turnover - a fumble on the '12 Ducks, an interception near midfield - and scored three times in 15 games. Stepfanie Taylor went first six carries for 61 yards, Andrew Luck completed six of seven passes and amassed a touchdown pass of 10 yards, and ducks were generally self-destruction.Over the next three quarters would be the Oregon win a Cardinal, 49-10. As they do, and can follow the same formula for victory, when the two teams meet tonight in Palo Alto?
For the second consecutive year, will meet with the Ducks and the Cardinal as a Top 10 program, a win and a loss of the State of Oklahoma (and let's face it: with the way Texas Tech last month is gone, they will probably beat 'clubs in Lubbock today simply because it does not make sense) would combine to give both teams a powerful shot a spot in the national championship game. The Cardinal is favored in this game, but with so many names themselves are key this year worth it to see if there was something unique (and reproducible) for the last three quarters of play of the last year. What to return to Oregon and would be able to do the same this year?
1. They Took The Flight :
When Taylor ran for a 44-yard touchdown that put the Cardinal up 21-3, Oregon has changed the game plan a bit. At this point, run the ball 10 times and spent six years last pass was intercepted by Thomas. However, during the next three units (all resulting in touchdowns), ducks changed the script. No, have not abandoned the race - in all three discs, LaMichael James was still six times for 38 yards, Darron Thomas four times for 41 - but the relationship has changed. Thomas spent 14 times, completing 11 passes for 145 yards, finding Jeff Maehle open for an easy success of a play-fake, and then find Josh Huff for another blow to other false. Ducks always uses the threat of the race (which was his identity, and it was too early to completely abandon the game plan), but uses screens and quick passes bubbles outside his favor, and time to Stanford extend side by side, who were more aggressive drilling small holes in the defense downfield.
They can do it again? Possibly. Their run-pass ratio this year, is almost identical to last year: we ran the ball 67 percent of the low time constant and 49 percent passing downs last year, these percentages are 68 percent and 48 percent respectively this year. In addition, although the loss of Maehle, seem to really pass the ball a little 'better in 2011. It 'still clearly a piece of the secondary equation Oregon (running the ball 48 percent of the time of passage are insanely high-low), but the ducks are in eighth place in the country in passing the S & P + and was only the twenty-first 'last year. And Thomas and James, both return after injury gimpy October, threatened to drive should be as realistic and dangerous than last year. Thomas' first four receivers (Lavasier Tuinei, Josh Huff, freshman tight end David Thomas and De'Anthony Paulson) have an average of at least 8.0 meters per Chip Kelly, and gives a lot of options. At the same time, Stanford ranks twenty-fourth in Def. Turning to the S & P +, as they did last year. likely that there are the Oregon offense.
2. It Is Likely That :
Stanford had touched the ball three times and scored three times. Oregon defense was incredibly underrated last year, but there was no immediate sign that they would never stop the chance and the Cardinal that day, so when they fell into a service break with two turnovers, they knew they might have to take a chance to get the picture back. They did not waste any time, triggering one of the kicks the most perfect Onside surprise you will ever see. The rebound may have been 25 percent skill, 75 percent of success, but it worked. Luck has left the field up 21-3, and the next time he went out again for a series of tests, the score was 21-17.
Aggressive risk is part of the DNA with Chip Kelly Oregon. You have to understand that they are ready to unleash a surprise or two if the situation requires - or in the case last year, it is - it.
3. All Hell Broke Loose Defense :
Oregon was recovered in the run (half time the score was Stanford 31, Oregon 24), but at this time, the ducks have always offered very little in terms of being able to stop Stanford's offense. His last four albums in the first half including two punts, but the Cardinal still scored 10 points and gained 7.5 yards per game (18 games, 135 yards) of these units.
In the second half, however Ducks stiffened. Stanford got the ball seven times in the second half: They turned the ball over three times (twice on interceptions), the danger twice turned the ball down inside the Oregon 10 times, and ran out of time on their last possession. He was the type of folding-so-strike whirlwind Ducks dropped to almost every team last year, and the Cardinal could not withstand the pressure.
The key to success in Oregon second half was what they could do on the lower standard. As Stanford slowly became one-dimensional (the Ducks took the 10 minutes into the third quarter and then up two touchdowns on the first play of the fourth quarter), Deputy strapped, but early in the second half, the Ducks have been on the attack. On low standards tried to Stanford had only 11 carries and 37 yards. Meanwhile, lucky ducks precipitated twice and intercepted him twice on the same low standard; Chance was just 8-of-15 passes for 82 yards (and the peaks mentioned above) on low standards, and Stanford prepares rates (the proportion of Standard for low total plays) fell to only 63 percent (national average: 69 percent). No matter how good the quarterback is, the low pass over it faces the worst will make his offense.
Add to that two red zone stands (Stanford had second and goal from Oregon and two did not score, then threw a pick of Oregon 11 on the next album) and it was a very Oregon detach.
Despite the loss of some serious moves on defense, the defense of Oregon in 2011 has improved from 13 to Def. F / + in the eighth. Meanwhile, a Stanford offense has dropped - yes, Heisman voters, declined - from second to Off. F / + in the eighth. The Cardinal are always excellent, of course, but if the Ducks were able to get under the skin luck with your speed and pressure last year, there's nothing saying they can not do it again this year.
Statistically, Oregon notes better in 2011 than in 2010, which is impressive considering how far it was last year. Depends on Stanford to prove they are capable of supporting the Oregon 60 minutes the storm better than they did 13 months ago. Oregon game was a bit of a turning point for the Cardinal in the first minute the game ended, the Cardinal may have been the best team in the country in the last three months of the season. I really have not lost since leaving Eugene, and they did what they must do thus far in 2011 to put in a position to give an appearance of national championship. They did it at his home in Oregon, which should help tremendously, but the pressure is on Stanford to show they are ready to attack in Oregon last year. In 2010, he blinked, what will they do this time?
Thirteen months ago, Oregon destroyed more than Stanford's final game of three quarters, the use of speed and offensive diversity in the process. Is the same script work tonight, or manipulate Cardinals Ducks a little better with a little home cooking?
November 12, 2011
After a quarter of the game last year in Eugene, Oregon led Stanford with an 21-3 margin. They converted two Oregon turnover - a fumble on the '12 Ducks, an interception near midfield - and scored three times in 15 games. Stepfanie Taylor went first six carries for 61 yards, Andrew Luck completed six of seven passes and amassed a touchdown pass of 10 yards, and ducks were generally self-destruction.Over the next three quarters would be the Oregon win a Cardinal, 49-10. As they do, and can follow the same formula for victory, when the two teams meet tonight in Palo Alto?
 |
| Oregon Stanford 2011 |
1. They Took The Flight :
When Taylor ran for a 44-yard touchdown that put the Cardinal up 21-3, Oregon has changed the game plan a bit. At this point, run the ball 10 times and spent six years last pass was intercepted by Thomas. However, during the next three units (all resulting in touchdowns), ducks changed the script. No, have not abandoned the race - in all three discs, LaMichael James was still six times for 38 yards, Darron Thomas four times for 41 - but the relationship has changed. Thomas spent 14 times, completing 11 passes for 145 yards, finding Jeff Maehle open for an easy success of a play-fake, and then find Josh Huff for another blow to other false. Ducks always uses the threat of the race (which was his identity, and it was too early to completely abandon the game plan), but uses screens and quick passes bubbles outside his favor, and time to Stanford extend side by side, who were more aggressive drilling small holes in the defense downfield.
They can do it again? Possibly. Their run-pass ratio this year, is almost identical to last year: we ran the ball 67 percent of the low time constant and 49 percent passing downs last year, these percentages are 68 percent and 48 percent respectively this year. In addition, although the loss of Maehle, seem to really pass the ball a little 'better in 2011. It 'still clearly a piece of the secondary equation Oregon (running the ball 48 percent of the time of passage are insanely high-low), but the ducks are in eighth place in the country in passing the S & P + and was only the twenty-first 'last year. And Thomas and James, both return after injury gimpy October, threatened to drive should be as realistic and dangerous than last year. Thomas' first four receivers (Lavasier Tuinei, Josh Huff, freshman tight end David Thomas and De'Anthony Paulson) have an average of at least 8.0 meters per Chip Kelly, and gives a lot of options. At the same time, Stanford ranks twenty-fourth in Def. Turning to the S & P +, as they did last year. likely that there are the Oregon offense.
2. It Is Likely That :
Stanford had touched the ball three times and scored three times. Oregon defense was incredibly underrated last year, but there was no immediate sign that they would never stop the chance and the Cardinal that day, so when they fell into a service break with two turnovers, they knew they might have to take a chance to get the picture back. They did not waste any time, triggering one of the kicks the most perfect Onside surprise you will ever see. The rebound may have been 25 percent skill, 75 percent of success, but it worked. Luck has left the field up 21-3, and the next time he went out again for a series of tests, the score was 21-17.
Aggressive risk is part of the DNA with Chip Kelly Oregon. You have to understand that they are ready to unleash a surprise or two if the situation requires - or in the case last year, it is - it.
3. All Hell Broke Loose Defense :
Oregon was recovered in the run (half time the score was Stanford 31, Oregon 24), but at this time, the ducks have always offered very little in terms of being able to stop Stanford's offense. His last four albums in the first half including two punts, but the Cardinal still scored 10 points and gained 7.5 yards per game (18 games, 135 yards) of these units.
In the second half, however Ducks stiffened. Stanford got the ball seven times in the second half: They turned the ball over three times (twice on interceptions), the danger twice turned the ball down inside the Oregon 10 times, and ran out of time on their last possession. He was the type of folding-so-strike whirlwind Ducks dropped to almost every team last year, and the Cardinal could not withstand the pressure.
The key to success in Oregon second half was what they could do on the lower standard. As Stanford slowly became one-dimensional (the Ducks took the 10 minutes into the third quarter and then up two touchdowns on the first play of the fourth quarter), Deputy strapped, but early in the second half, the Ducks have been on the attack. On low standards tried to Stanford had only 11 carries and 37 yards. Meanwhile, lucky ducks precipitated twice and intercepted him twice on the same low standard; Chance was just 8-of-15 passes for 82 yards (and the peaks mentioned above) on low standards, and Stanford prepares rates (the proportion of Standard for low total plays) fell to only 63 percent (national average: 69 percent). No matter how good the quarterback is, the low pass over it faces the worst will make his offense.
Add to that two red zone stands (Stanford had second and goal from Oregon and two did not score, then threw a pick of Oregon 11 on the next album) and it was a very Oregon detach.
Despite the loss of some serious moves on defense, the defense of Oregon in 2011 has improved from 13 to Def. F / + in the eighth. Meanwhile, a Stanford offense has dropped - yes, Heisman voters, declined - from second to Off. F / + in the eighth. The Cardinal are always excellent, of course, but if the Ducks were able to get under the skin luck with your speed and pressure last year, there's nothing saying they can not do it again this year.
Statistically, Oregon notes better in 2011 than in 2010, which is impressive considering how far it was last year. Depends on Stanford to prove they are capable of supporting the Oregon 60 minutes the storm better than they did 13 months ago. Oregon game was a bit of a turning point for the Cardinal in the first minute the game ended, the Cardinal may have been the best team in the country in the last three months of the season. I really have not lost since leaving Eugene, and they did what they must do thus far in 2011 to put in a position to give an appearance of national championship. They did it at his home in Oregon, which should help tremendously, but the pressure is on Stanford to show they are ready to attack in Oregon last year. In 2010, he blinked, what will they do this time?
0 comments
Post a Comment